[CRISP-TEAM] Suggested text -III.A.4. Establishment of a Review Committee

Bill Woodcock woody at pch.net
Tue Jan 13 22:28:51 CET 2015

> On Jan 13, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> Below is the suggested text to be added in III.A.4. Establishment of a
>> Review Committee, the last paragraph.
>> ---
>> The selection of the Review Committe members should be conducted in an
>> open, bottom up and inclusive mechanims, appropriate for each RIR
>> region. There should be equal representation from from each RIR region
>> inconstituting the Review Committee.
>> ---
> I believe that we already had consensus on that text.

Modulo a space in the middle of “inconstituting” and my usual warning against slathering “open, bottom-up” on everything.

As I was applying everybody’s edits yesterday, it occurred to me to wonder why “multistakeholder” wasn’t being used in the document…  Did that question already get hashed through?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150113/38f2200d/signature.asc>

More information about the CRISP mailing list