[CRISP-TEAM] Suggested Text - III.A.3 (consultation with the community)

[Andres Piazza]

Dear Andrei,

I support the new text with "the RIRs" instead of "the RIRs Staff".

Regards,

Andrés

El 13/1/15 a las 9:17, Izumi Okutani escribió:
> + 1 This proposed text looks great.
>
> Izumi
>
> On 2015/01/13 20:39, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>> On 13 jan 2015, at 12:04, Paul Rendek <rendek at ripe.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> Yes, that it Andrei, this new text you propose looks great to me.
>> +1
>> Nurani
>>
>>> I support it.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/13/15 10:58 AM, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 13/01/15 10:34:
>>>>> Thank you Andrei for drafing the suggested text which refers to opne
>>>>> consultation of the SLA.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your suggested text looks good to me, and perhaps it would strengthen
>>>>> our rationale on why RIR staff will draft, if we could add something like:
>>>>>
>>>>> It is expected that RIR staff will draft the specific language of this
>>>>> agreement *as the direct stakeholder of the number resources component
>>>>> of the IANA function*,
>>>>>
>>>> Thank you Izumi, this addition makes sense to me. Perhaps (also changing
>>>> "the RIR staff" to "the RIRs" for consistency with other principles):
>>>>
>>>> It is expected that the RIRs, as the contractual party of this
>>>> agreement, will draft the specific language of this agreement,...
>>>>
>>>> So the new version will read:
>>>>
>>>> NEW:
>>>>
>>>> It is expected that the RIRs, as the contractual party of this
>>>> agreement, will draft the specific language of this agreement. During
>>>> the drafting process the RIRs are expected to consult the RIR
>>>> communities.  The drafting process will be guided by the principles
>>>> listed below. References to relevant sections of the current NTIA
>>>> agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement will share
>>>> many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Andrei
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> (the part marked in * suggested to be added)
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't have to be worded in the way I suggested but was wondering if
>>>>> it's worth explaining why RIRs are responsible, which seems like the
>>>>> source of confusion for some.
>>>>>
>>>>> What are your thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> Izumi
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2015/01/13 18:18, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is a suggested addition to the text in order to reflect the
>>>>>> expectation of the community that the RIRs will consult the community
>>>>>> when developing the SLAs. We believe that the concerns raised by people
>>>>>> on the ianaxfer related to some specific details of dispute resolution
>>>>>> and applicable law come from the fear that this is the last opportunity
>>>>>> for the community to voice their opinion. The additional statement is
>>>>>> aimed to assure this is not the case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OLD:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is expected that RIR staff will draft the specific language of this
>>>>>> agreement, and that the drafting process will be guided by the
>>>>>> principles listed below. References to relevant sections of the current
>>>>>> NTIA agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement will
>>>>>> share many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NEW:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is expected that RIR staff will draft the specific language of this
>>>>>> agreement. During the drafting process RIR staff is expected to consult
>>>>>> the RIR communities.  The drafting process will be guided by the
>>>>>> principles listed below. References to relevant sections of the current
>>>>>> NTIA agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement will
>>>>>> share many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your feedback is welcome,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp