[CRISP-TEAM] [NRO-IANAXFER] Thanks, and comments on the second draft proposal
robachevsky at isoc.org
Tue Jan 13 18:11:36 CET 2015
Thank you very much for summarizing this!
Izumi Okutani wrote on 13/01/15 17:45:
> - It is formatted in the way to define "“IANA Numbering Services”."
> - Changes in some wording of the IANA services decribed
> - Added descritption about other services including returned IP address
> space, and general registry maintenance
> - Use of the word "subdomains below" and replaced with alternative
> [Alan: the last text is your suggestion to Andrew Sullivan to would like
> you especially to see if you are OK]
I think the description of the service is more clear as suggested in
this latest revision. I also like that we moved away from "delegation"
to "the administration of the special-purpose “IN-ADDR.ARPA”
and“IP6.ARPA" DNS zones, which I think eliminates Sullivan's concern.
> - Changes in wording to describe the number resources services
> - Changes in wording about description of overlaps with the IETF
> [Andrei and Alan: Would like to especially confirm whether you are
> comfortable with the way it has suggested to describe and the choice of
Yes, I am, modulo some of the changes I proposed just before.
> - Change in wording to describe the global policy development process,
> deleted that part which says included the part covered by the IETF
> (his point is IETF defines spefications and not policies, it seems)
I am fine with that. I think specifications is less ambiguous and
sufficient in this case.
> - Agreement of all RIR communities (in according with their respective
> PDPs) : (instead of RIRs in the current text
> Other note:
> - His point about "It is incorrect that an identical version must be
> approved by all RIRs." had been addressed by Paul Rendek and Nurani's
> comments (i.e. we change according to Paul Wilson)
> - would not have--> no any significant impact on the continuity of
> - services currently provided by ICANN-->
> Internet number-related IANA Numbering Services
> A decision by the NTIA to discontinue its stewardship of the IANA
> functions, and therefore its contractual relationship with the IANA
> functions operator, *would not have--> no* any significant impact on the
> continuity of Internet number-related IANA Numbering Services [delete:
> services currently provided by ICANN]
Along with the following "However, it would remove a significant element
of oversight from the current system." I think "no impact" is an
> - Wording change in proposal element (3)
> In description of IANA trademark and iana.org domain
> - Added " (in particular the IANA Numbers Registries)"
That is fine.
> - RIR communities --> Internet community
Ah, I did not spot this! I think we are speaking on behalf of the RIR
communities, so we cannot say the "Internet community".
> [Andrei you may especially want to check here]
> IANA Agreement Principles ii
> - Deleted "The IANA Operator will delegate subdomains below the
> IN-ADDR.ARPA and IP6.ARPA domains in accordance with the allocation of
> IPv4 and IPv6 addresses."
I think this is cleaner and more concise, since we provided the
definition of the "IANA Numbering Services”in I.A.
More information about the CRISP