[CRISP-TEAM] Possible inconsinstency pointed out on IRP for Section III A2 and IIIA3

[Paul Rendek]

Yes, I agree. Well spotted Alan and thanks Andrei for actually listing
these. It makes it much clearer.

Cheers,
Paul


On 1/13/15 4:32 PM, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Agree.
>
> I think confusion comes from the fact that we are talking about 3
> differrent things and perhaps do not articulating this sufficiently:
>
> - IANA trademark and IANA.ORG domain  -> IETF Trust
> - public number resource registries -> public domain
> - Any future intellectual property rights -> public domain or RIRs
>
> Regarding the third one, I think it depends on the nature of the IPRs,
> we may as well include the IETF Trust as a potential destination.
>
> Andrei
>
> Alan Barrett wrote on 13/01/15 17:07:
>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>> These is a highlighting the texts related to IRP where confirmation
>>> about possible inconsistency expressed on the IANAXFER list.
>>>
>>> Do any of you think we need to improve any part of the text to make it
>>> sound less inconsistent?
>> Yes, I think we could improve the text.
>>
>> I think we would like some IPR to be vested in neutral organisations,
>> and some IPR to be in the public domain.  Section III.A.3.ix seems to me
>> to be talking about the part that should be in the puiblic domain
>> (almosst everything except the trademank and domain name), but it could
>> be worded more clearly.
>>
>> Also, III.A.3.ix talks about "public domain or the RIRs", while III.A.2
>> does not have "or the RIRs".  They should be consistent.
>>
>> Where did "or the RIRs" come from?  I seem to recall discussions about
>> the public domain.
>>
>> --apb (Alan Barrett)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>