[CRISP-TEAM] Possible inconsinstency pointed out on IRP for Section III A2 and IIIA3

[Andrei Robachevsky]

Agree.

I think confusion comes from the fact that we are talking about 3
differrent things and perhaps do not articulating this sufficiently:

- IANA trademark and IANA.ORG domain  -> IETF Trust
- public number resource registries -> public domain
- Any future intellectual property rights -> public domain or RIRs

Regarding the third one, I think it depends on the nature of the IPRs,
we may as well include the IETF Trust as a potential destination.

Andrei

Alan Barrett wrote on 13/01/15 17:07:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> These is a highlighting the texts related to IRP where confirmation
>> about possible inconsistency expressed on the IANAXFER list.
>>
>> Do any of you think we need to improve any part of the text to make it
>> sound less inconsistent?
> 
> Yes, I think we could improve the text.
> 
> I think we would like some IPR to be vested in neutral organisations,
> and some IPR to be in the public domain.  Section III.A.3.ix seems to me
> to be talking about the part that should be in the puiblic domain
> (almosst everything except the trademank and domain name), but it could
> be worded more clearly.
> 
> Also, III.A.3.ix talks about "public domain or the RIRs", while III.A.2
> does not have "or the RIRs".  They should be consistent.
> 
> Where did "or the RIRs" come from?  I seem to recall discussions about
> the public domain.
> 
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp