[CRISP-TEAM] Possible inconsinstency pointed out on IRP for Section III A2 and IIIA3
apb at cequrux.com
Tue Jan 13 17:07:48 CET 2015
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> These is a highlighting the texts related to IRP where
> confirmation about possible inconsistency expressed on the
> IANAXFER list.
> Do any of you think we need to improve any part of the text to
> make it sound less inconsistent?
Yes, I think we could improve the text.
I think we would like some IPR to be vested in neutral
organisations, and some IPR to be in the public domain. Section
III.A.3.ix seems to me to be talking about the part that should be
in the puiblic domain (almosst everything except the trademank and
domain name), but it could be worded more clearly.
Also, III.A.3.ix talks about "public domain or the RIRs", while
III.A.2 does not have "or the RIRs". They should be consistent.
Where did "or the RIRs" come from? I seem to recall discussions
about the public domain.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP