Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com
Tue Jan 13 13:30:11 CET 2015

On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Paul Rendek wrote:
>Thanks for going through the doc to find these instances. I have
>included my comment inline below.
>I wanted to ask whether you also scanned the doc to find instances where
>we noted 'NRO' where it may be more appropriate to use 'RIR'. I think
>this also needs to be done.

I think I did that, and found no instances that needed to be changed.
However, I should probably do it again to check.

>> III.A.1, last paragraph:
>>    While there are no concrete needs or plans at this point, the NRO
>>    EC may in the future determine that the IANA Numbering Services
>>    should be transferred to a different contractor. In such a case,
>>    selection of a new contractor shall be conducted in a fair, open and
>>    transparent process, in line with applicable industry best practices
>>    and standards.
>> I suggest changing that to "the RIRs, acting through the NRO EC, may in
>> future ...".
>I think its better as:
>"the RIRs, may in future... "
>I don't think the addition of "acting through the NRO EC" adds anyting
>here. I would suggest to leave this out.


--apb (Alan Barrett)

More information about the CRISP mailing list