[CRISP-TEAM] Suggested Text - III.A.3 (consultation with the community)
Izumi Okutani
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Tue Jan 13 13:17:16 CET 2015
+ 1 This proposed text looks great.
Izumi
On 2015/01/13 20:39, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>
> On 13 jan 2015, at 12:04, Paul Rendek <rendek at ripe.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Yes, that it Andrei, this new text you propose looks great to me.
>
> +1
> Nurani
>
>>
>> I support it.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> On 1/13/15 10:58 AM, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 13/01/15 10:34:
>>>> Thank you Andrei for drafing the suggested text which refers to opne
>>>> consultation of the SLA.
>>>>
>>>> Your suggested text looks good to me, and perhaps it would strengthen
>>>> our rationale on why RIR staff will draft, if we could add something like:
>>>>
>>>> It is expected that RIR staff will draft the specific language of this
>>>> agreement *as the direct stakeholder of the number resources component
>>>> of the IANA function*,
>>>>
>>> Thank you Izumi, this addition makes sense to me. Perhaps (also changing
>>> "the RIR staff" to "the RIRs" for consistency with other principles):
>>>
>>> It is expected that the RIRs, as the contractual party of this
>>> agreement, will draft the specific language of this agreement,...
>>>
>>> So the new version will read:
>>>
>>> NEW:
>>>
>>> It is expected that the RIRs, as the contractual party of this
>>> agreement, will draft the specific language of this agreement. During
>>> the drafting process the RIRs are expected to consult the RIR
>>> communities. The drafting process will be guided by the principles
>>> listed below. References to relevant sections of the current NTIA
>>> agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement will share
>>> many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>>
>>>> (the part marked in * suggested to be added)
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't have to be worded in the way I suggested but was wondering if
>>>> it's worth explaining why RIRs are responsible, which seems like the
>>>> source of confusion for some.
>>>>
>>>> What are your thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Izumi
>>>>
>>>> On 2015/01/13 18:18, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is a suggested addition to the text in order to reflect the
>>>>> expectation of the community that the RIRs will consult the community
>>>>> when developing the SLAs. We believe that the concerns raised by people
>>>>> on the ianaxfer related to some specific details of dispute resolution
>>>>> and applicable law come from the fear that this is the last opportunity
>>>>> for the community to voice their opinion. The additional statement is
>>>>> aimed to assure this is not the case.
>>>>>
>>>>> OLD:
>>>>>
>>>>> It is expected that RIR staff will draft the specific language of this
>>>>> agreement, and that the drafting process will be guided by the
>>>>> principles listed below. References to relevant sections of the current
>>>>> NTIA agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement will
>>>>> share many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>>>>>
>>>>> NEW:
>>>>>
>>>>> It is expected that RIR staff will draft the specific language of this
>>>>> agreement. During the drafting process RIR staff is expected to consult
>>>>> the RIR communities. The drafting process will be guided by the
>>>>> principles listed below. References to relevant sections of the current
>>>>> NTIA agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement will
>>>>> share many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your feedback is welcome,
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CRISP mailing list
>>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
More information about the CRISP
mailing list