[CRISP-TEAM] Suggested Text - III.A.3 (consultation with the community)

[Paul Rendek]

Hello All,

Yes, that it Andrei, this new text you propose looks great to me.

I support it.

Paul


On 1/13/15 10:58 AM, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Izumi Okutani wrote on 13/01/15 10:34:
>> Thank you Andrei for drafing the suggested text which refers to opne
>> consultation of the SLA.
>>
>> Your suggested text looks good to me, and perhaps it would strengthen
>> our rationale on why RIR staff will draft, if we could add something like:
>>
>> It is expected that RIR staff will draft the specific language of this
>> agreement *as the direct stakeholder of the number resources component
>> of the IANA function*,
>>
> Thank you Izumi, this addition makes sense to me. Perhaps (also changing
> "the RIR staff" to "the RIRs" for consistency with other principles):
>
> It is expected that the RIRs, as the contractual party of this
> agreement, will draft the specific language of this agreement,...
>
> So the new version will read:
>
> NEW:
>
> It is expected that the RIRs, as the contractual party of this
> agreement, will draft the specific language of this agreement. During
> the drafting process the RIRs are expected to consult the RIR
> communities.  The drafting process will be guided by the principles
> listed below. References to relevant sections of the current NTIA
> agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement will share
> many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei
>
>
>> (the part marked in * suggested to be added)
>>
>> It doesn't have to be worded in the way I suggested but was wondering if
>> it's worth explaining why RIRs are responsible, which seems like the
>> source of confusion for some.
>>
>> What are your thoughts?
>>
>> Izumi
>>
>> On 2015/01/13 18:18, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here is a suggested addition to the text in order to reflect the
>>> expectation of the community that the RIRs will consult the community
>>> when developing the SLAs. We believe that the concerns raised by people
>>> on the ianaxfer related to some specific details of dispute resolution
>>> and applicable law come from the fear that this is the last opportunity
>>> for the community to voice their opinion. The additional statement is
>>> aimed to assure this is not the case.
>>>
>>> OLD:
>>>
>>> It is expected that RIR staff will draft the specific language of this
>>> agreement, and that the drafting process will be guided by the
>>> principles listed below. References to relevant sections of the current
>>> NTIA agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement will
>>> share many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>>>
>>> NEW:
>>>
>>> It is expected that RIR staff will draft the specific language of this
>>> agreement. During the drafting process RIR staff is expected to consult
>>> the RIR communities.  The drafting process will be guided by the
>>> principles listed below. References to relevant sections of the current
>>> NTIA agreement are also noted, as it is expected the new agreement will
>>> share many of the same contractual goals and mechanisms.
>>>
>>>
>>> Your feedback is welcome,
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>