[CRISP-TEAM] Editorial suggestions

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Mon Jan 12 17:33:40 CET 2015

I must add from Andres as well, under the thread "Last version of the
proposal with the table of version control".


On 2015/01/13 1:32, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> Thank you Michael, Alan and Bill.
> To to share the list of people who have made editorical suggestions, 
> based on my memory.
>   - Alan Barett, Bill Woodcock, Mwendwa Kivuva, Niall(through Nurani),
>     Pindar Wong (through Izumi)
>   - myself (Izumi Okutani): See word attachment for the specific changes
>    "A few formating changes to Section III"
> on IANAXFER list
>   - Wilfred Woeber
>   - Paul Wilson
> Thanks,
> Izumi
> On 2015/01/13 1:22, Michael Abejuela wrote:
>> Thank you Alan and Bill for working with me on this.  In response to your
>> e-mail Alan, please see below:
>> (1)    Yes you are correct, that is the document and the most recent 
>> one I
>> sent to you I apologize had the same file name but the only change was 
>> the
>> metadata change.
>> (2)    Bill, I know you are out of pocket with the Board meeting and 
>> travel
>> immediately afterwards.  Alan, if you provide me your edits with track
>> changes, I can work on combining the edits into a master document.  Then
>> you can get some much needed and deserved rest!
>> (3)    I do have a prior commitment that will take me offline from 
>> 22:00 UTC
>> to 02:00 UTC but can combine the edits after that.  I anticipate being
>> able to complete the combination by 03:00 UTC.
>> (4)    I can then circulate to both of Alan and Bill, and Bill, if you 
>> can do
>> a ���copyedit��� (and any other editorial changes we may have missed) 
>> pass,
>> that would be great.
>> (5)    To keep consistent with the process that has been in place, 
>> Bill, once
>> you have done your copyedit pass, could you send to me and Alan and 
>> then I
>> will finalize with clean and redline versions as well as various formats
>> for both posting on the IANAXFER list and providing to German for website
>> updates.
>> I agree, we do need two copyedit rounds (1) editorial and (2) substantive
>> as this is what was agreed on the call today.  Have I missed anything and
>> does this work for everyone?
>> Thanks,
>> -Michael
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

More information about the CRISP mailing list