[CRISP-TEAM] CRISP Team position per issues discussed at the 11th call Re: Summary of Discussions point for each issue

Andrei Robachevsky robachevsky at isoc.org
Mon Jan 12 17:28:09 CET 2015

Thank you Izumi, for the very helpful summary!

Izumi Okutani wrote on 12/01/15 17:08:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> e. Budget Review
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> (Seun Ojedeji)
>  - There is no section talking about budget review in the second
>    draft.
>  - I understand 800k+USD is contributed annually to ICANN by all
>    RIRs, may I know if ICANN presents annual budget specifically for
>    this contribution? If yes who does the review? If no then I suggest
>    it be incorporated in our proposal and I think it's something NRO NC
>    can do
>   [CRISP Team postion]
>   - No changes wil be made to the proposal text

In my understanding while we agreed not to address the budget review
directly, we agreed to include a new principle stating that the contract
fee will be based on cost recovery.

Inclusion of this principle will also imply that the current
contribution is outside the scope of the proposed agreement and its fee
will be negotiated separately. It will also addresse the question of
budget review, if considered together with the principle vii. Term and
Termination (RIRs will be able to periodically review the agreement and
evaluate whether they want to renew the agreement.).

Apologies if I misunderstood the outcome of this discussion.



More information about the CRISP mailing list