[CRISP-TEAM] the Review Committee: Comment from Seun Ojedeji Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final Call for Comments
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Mon Jan 12 17:13:17 CET 2015
Same as my comment for "Dispute Resolution and details of SLA" -
We agreed on CRISP Team position as summarized in my e-mail
"CRISP Team position per issues discussed at the 11th call".
It would be helpful if you could comment on that thread before the
coming call at UTC13:00 13th Jan, if you have comments about the CRISP
Team postiion we agreed.
On 2015/01/13 0:12, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> On Jan 12, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
>> Seun also suggested that, instead of saying that "the NRO EC" shall
>> create a Review Committee, the document should give that responsibility
>> to "the RIRs" or "the RIR communities". I'd also be fine with that
>> More generally, in other cases where we say that the NRO EC will do something, we could consider saying "the RIRs". The cases that come to mind are: deciding to move the IANA function away from ICANN in the future (section III.A.1), last paragraph "the NRO EC may in the future determine ..."); periodic review of the service level (section III.A.4 fisrt paragraph "the NRO EC will conduct periodic reviews"); creation of the Review Committee (section III.A.4 second paragraph "The NRO EC shall establish a Review Committee���).
> I agree. Saying ���the RIRs��� includes the entire community, and by reference, the open, bottom-up process. The NRO EC is five people, who are not elected by the community.
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP