[CRISP-TEAM] Editorial suggestions

[Bill Woodcock]

> On Jan 12, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
> Thank you Bill. Wonderful.
> 
> Would you work together with Alan and Michael on this.
> 
> We agreed to first publish the editorial version before incorporating
> substantive changes, so that the community can indentify and
> distingutish between purely editorical changes, and substantial changes.
> (This is what we did for the 1st draft as well)
> 
> 1) Produce version with editorial changes
> 
> 2) Produce version with substantial changes

Understood.  Alan and Michael, I believe our five steps should be to (1) fix with certainty what base document we’re working from, (2) compile all of the applicable edits, (3) apply those edits, (4) copyedit the result for grammar, punctuation, etc., and (5) return the edited draft to the list.

What is our timeframe for accomplishing these five steps?

I’m in the ARIN board meeting right now (until 21:30 UTC), and on an airplane after that (23:00 UTC until 08:00 UTC tomorrow).  If Alan and Michael can nail down (1) and as much of (2) as possible by 22:30 UTC, I can put in at least four hours of dedicated work on (2) through (4) before 08:00 UTC, and suggest that we could have finished (4) and (5) by 20:00 UTC Wednesday.  Is that sufficient?  Or should we put off (4) until substantive edits are applied, and try to borrow ourselves ten or twelve hours now?

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150112/55bf2be8/signature.asc>