[CRISP-TEAM] the Review Committee: Comment from Seun Ojedeji Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final Call for Comments

[Bill Woodcock]

> On Jan 12, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
> 
> Seun also suggested that, instead of saying that "the NRO EC" shall
> create a Review Committee, the document should give that responsibility
> to "the RIRs" or "the RIR communities".  I'd also be fine with that
> change.
> 
> More generally, in other cases where we say that the NRO EC will do something, we could consider saying "the RIRs".  The cases that come to mind are: deciding to move the IANA function away from ICANN in the future (section III.A.1), last paragraph "the NRO EC may in the future determine ..."); periodic review of the service level (section III.A.4 fisrt paragraph "the NRO EC will conduct periodic reviews"); creation of the Review Committee (section III.A.4 second paragraph "The NRO EC shall establish a Review Committee”).

I agree.  Saying “the RIRs” includes the entire community, and by reference, the open, bottom-up process.  The NRO EC is five people, who are not elected by the community.

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150112/855c93ac/signature.asc>