[CRISP-TEAM] Dispute Resolution and details of SLA: Comment from Richard Hill Fwd: RE: [NRO-IANAXFER] What would be helpful when sharing your input

[Bill Woodcock]

> On 1/12/15, 5:56 AM, "Nurani Nimpuno" <nurani at netnod.se> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 12 jan 2015, at 11:52, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>>> I support the idea of saying that the RIRs must consult the community
>>>> consult the community every step of the way.
>>> 
>>> A line seems to have been deleted from my message.  What I intended to
>>> say was:
>>> 
>>> I support the idea of saying that the RIRs must consult the community
>>> before the contract is finalised.  I do not think that the RIRs need to
>>> consult the community every step of the way.
>> 
>> Well, that makes a lot better sense. :-)
>> I agree with this!

Agreed.  Bottom-up yes, inverse-micro-management no.  :-)

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150112/da0a8619/signature.asc>