[CRISP-TEAM] Dispute Resolution and details of SLA: Comment from Richard Hill Fwd: RE: [NRO-IANAXFER] What would be helpful when sharing your input
woody at pch.net
Mon Jan 12 15:10:43 CET 2015
> On 1/12/15, 5:56 AM, "Nurani Nimpuno" <nurani at netnod.se> wrote:
>> On 12 jan 2015, at 11:52, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>>> I support the idea of saying that the RIRs must consult the community
>>>> consult the community every step of the way.
>>> A line seems to have been deleted from my message. What I intended to
>>> say was:
>>> I support the idea of saying that the RIRs must consult the community
>>> before the contract is finalised. I do not think that the RIRs need to
>>> consult the community every step of the way.
>> Well, that makes a lot better sense. :-)
>> I agree with this!
Agreed. Bottom-up yes, inverse-micro-management no. :-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the CRISP