[CRISP-TEAM] Dispute Resolution and details of SLA: Comment from Richard Hill Fwd: RE: [NRO-IANAXFER] What would be helpful when sharing your input

[Izumi Okutani]

I think we have an agreement in this at this stage, while I'd like
discuss at the call shortly.

I personally support this as well.

Izumi


On 2015/01/12 20:26, Paul Rendek wrote:
> Much better, I agree with this.
> 
> Cheers,
> Paul
> 
> 
> On 1/12/15 10:56 AM, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>> On 12 jan 2015, at 11:52, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>>> I support the idea of saying that the RIRs must consult the community consult the community every step of the way.
>>> A line seems to have been deleted from my message.  What I intended to
>>> say was:
>>>
>>> I support the idea of saying that the RIRs must consult the community before the contract is finalised.  I do not think that the RIRs need to consult the community every step of the way.
>> Well, that makes a lot better sense. :-)
>> I agree with this!
>>
>> Nurani
>>
>>> --apb (Alan Barrett)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>