[CRISP-TEAM] Dispute Resolution and details of SLA: Comment from Richard Hill Fwd: RE: [NRO-IANAXFER] What would be helpful when sharing your input

Paul Rendek rendek at ripe.net
Mon Jan 12 12:26:40 CET 2015


Much better, I agree with this.

Cheers,
Paul


On 1/12/15 10:56 AM, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> On 12 jan 2015, at 11:52, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>> I support the idea of saying that the RIRs must consult the community consult the community every step of the way.
>> A line seems to have been deleted from my message.  What I intended to
>> say was:
>>
>> I support the idea of saying that the RIRs must consult the community before the contract is finalised.  I do not think that the RIRs need to consult the community every step of the way.
> Well, that makes a lot better sense. :-)
> I agree with this! 
>
> Nurani
>
>> --apb (Alan Barrett)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>





More information about the CRISP mailing list