[CRISP-TEAM] Document status inside the document

Nurani Nimpuno nurani at netnod.se
Mon Jan 12 10:25:07 CET 2015

Good suggestion!

On 11 jan 2015, at 08:39, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:

> I suggest adding a paragraph of document status inside the document,
> in between the heading "Draft Response to the Internet Coordination
> Group Request for Proposals on IANA from the RIR community" and the
> fiste heading "1. Proposal Type".  It could say who wrote the document,
> and which version this is.
> I note that the ICG RFP uses number 0, not 1, in the heading "0. Proposal type", and I think we should do the same.
> I also think that the title would be better is we moved "from the RIR
> community" closer to the beginning.
> So, I suggest that the top of our document should say something like
> this:
>     Draft Response from the RIR community
>     to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on IANA
>  This document is a response from the Internet addressing community
>  to the ICG Request for Proposals.  It was prepared by the CRISP Team,
>  which was established by the five Regional Internet Registries
>  (RIRs) specifically for the purpose of producing this document.
>  This is the second draft, published on 8 January 2015.
>  0. Proposal type
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

More information about the CRISP mailing list