[CRISP-TEAM] Question From Pindar Wong Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA StewardshipProposal: Final Call for Comments
apb at cequrux.com
Mon Jan 12 09:44:45 CET 2015
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> How do we want to reply to Pindar's question?
> (It doesn't seem to be a high priority but I think it is worth
> clarifying as it is related to the essential element of our
> My draft response is:
> The CRISP Team thinks the contract is the most straightforward
> way of adressing this, as NTIA covers this part by the contract
> with IANA function operator (i.e., ICANN).
> What is currently covered in NTIA-IANA contract will no longer
> be valid as a result of the IANA stewardship transition by
> NTIA. We want to cover what is covered in the NTIA-IANA contract
> today, by replacing this with IANA-RIR contract after the
That's fine. We could also mention that the community asked for a
binding SLA to be developed. At least in the AFRINIC reagion, I
heard suggestions for a contract and SLA.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP