[CRISP-TEAM] Question From Pindar Wong Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA StewardshipProposal: Final Call for Comments

Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com
Mon Jan 12 09:44:45 CET 2015

On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> How do we want to reply to Pindar's question?
> (It doesn't seem to be a high priority but I think it is worth 
> clarifying as it is related to the essential element of our 
> proposal)
> My draft response is:
> ---
> The CRISP Team thinks the contract is the most straightforward 
> way of adressing this, as NTIA covers this part by the contract 
> with IANA function operator (i.e., ICANN).
> What is currently covered in NTIA-IANA contract will no longer 
> be valid as a result of the IANA stewardship transition by 
> NTIA. We want to cover what is covered in the NTIA-IANA contract 
> today, by replacing this with IANA-RIR contract after the 
> transition.
> ---

That's fine.  We could also mention that the community asked for a 
binding SLA to be developed.  At least in the AFRINIC reagion, I 
heard suggestions for a contract and SLA.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

More information about the CRISP mailing list