[CRISP-TEAM] Comment from Richard Hill Fwd: RE: [NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final Call for Comments

[Bill Woodcock]

> On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:30 PM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at netnod.se> wrote:
> 
>> - I don't agree with saying this wasn't bottom-up.
>>  I don't think having low input (if true) equals no bottom-up.
>>  There area reasons for this.
>>  e.g.., most RIR communities are comfortable with the current IANA
>>        operation and don't feel the strong urge to comment as there
>>        is no direct NTIA involvement today
> 
> I don't agree with his observation. Yes, there was unfortunately very little discussion on the ianaxfer-list. Possibly due to the terrible timing over the Christmas and New Year's break.
> 
> And the low participation on the ianaxfer list does concern me. Not because I don't feel our proposal reflects the community's view - I think it does. But because of perception.
> 
> I know that there was quite a lot of feedback in the RIPE region.

Likewise, although this process has not coincided with any ARIN meetings, there has been a lot of discussion and community contribution within the ARIN region, which did not happen on the IANAXFER list.  So I believe that the community is engaged, and their level of input is robust.

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150111/24f9d71c/signature.asc>