[CRISP-TEAM] [NRO secretariat] NRO CRISP website improvements

[Craig Ng]

Hello German

This looks good. May I suggest that, on the front page of the NRO website,
there is a "Quick Reference Points" link to the CRISP team, seeing that
there are lots of activities here at this time.

Craig



On 10/01/2015 12:50 am, "German Valdez" <german at nro.net> wrote:

> Please take a look to the www.nro.net/crisp-team
> <http://www.nro.net/crisp-team>  page, I think I have addressed your
> observation here.
> 
> Looking forward for receiving your input
> 
> German
> 
> 
>> On 9 Jan 2015, at 9:25 pm, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>> 
>> Nurani & CRISP Team,
>> 
>> 
>> I have put this on the agenda for the coming call.
>> 
>> I agree with your reasoning in needing to address and the need to revise
>> the points you listed.
>> 
>> Regarding A separate, clearly visible "Latest draft" link,
>> I recall this was discussed and observed general agreement in a past
>> call as well.
>> 
>> My comments inline and perhaps German can also help us confirm whether
>> they (all or partially) can be accomodated, with the resource it requires.
>> 
>> 
>> On 2015/01/09 18:33, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I am reluctant to add more work ot the NRO secretariat (sorry German!), but
>>> I was wondering if we could make some improvements to the NRO CRISP webpage?
>>> 
>>> o "How to provide input"
>>>   Maybe there needs to be a clear header called "How to provide
>>>   input". At the moment, it is not clear to "newcomers", how and
>>>   where they can comment.
>>>   (We have now listed pointers to the ianxfer-list, but it might
>>>   not be clear that this is *the place* to send your input.)
>> 
>> I agreed.
>> 
>>> o Clear timeline and current deadline on the page
>>>   Currently the timeline is listed in a PDF with the title
>>>   "CRISP TELECONFERENCE DOCUMENT MATERIAL". If people come to
>>>   the page, I think it's important that they immediately can
>>>   see what the timelines are.
>>>   Can we add a clear "deadline for input to 2nd draft" to
>>>   the page?
>> 
>> I agree. This can probably also move to where the latest document can be
>> view.
>> 
>>> o A separate, clearly visible "Latest draft" link
>>>   If we want input to this draft, maybe there needs to be a
>>>   clear link that stands out on the page in addition to the
>>>   one in the list at the bottom of the page.
>> 
>> Indeed. In addition to the draft, all the latest documents. i.e., latest
>> issues list and timeline.
>> 
>>> o CRISP Charter -> less prominent
>>>   This is important, but I'm not sure if it needs to be almost
>>>   at the top of the page. Maybe it should be moved down or
>>>   shifted to a separate page?
>>> 
>>> o CRISP Team members  -> less prominent
>>>   Again, important, but maybe that should be shifted to under
>>>   the information that is directly relevant to those who want
>>>   to participate in the process?
>> 
>> I agree both the above information can go lower in the page, or a
>> seperate page.
>> 
>>> I realise that these might sound like rather detailed comments. But I think
>>> it is important that we
>>> 
>>> a) Make it as easy as possible for people to find the right information and
>>> provide their input
>>> b) Leave a clear public archive of the process that show that we have done
>>> our job properly and in a transparent manner.
>>> 
>>> I am getting a few questions from members in the community about how, what,
>>> when and where, which indicates to me that maybe it's not all clear to
>>> everyone.
>>> 
>>> Happy to hear your thoughts on this!
>>> 
>> 
>> Thank you for raising this.  As mentioned I agree with your reasoning,
>> especially from the fact you are getting questions.
>> 
>> 
>> Izumi
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150109/01c5aabd/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3565 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150109/01c5aabd/smime.p7s>