[CRISP-TEAM] [NRO secretariat] NRO CRISP website improvements
german at nro.net
Fri Jan 9 14:50:17 CET 2015
Please take a look to the www.nro.net/crisp-team <http://www.nro.net/crisp-team> page, I think I have addressed your observation here.
Looking forward for receiving your input
> On 9 Jan 2015, at 9:25 pm, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> Nurani & CRISP Team,
> I have put this on the agenda for the coming call.
> I agree with your reasoning in needing to address and the need to revise
> the points you listed.
> Regarding A separate, clearly visible "Latest draft" link,
> I recall this was discussed and observed general agreement in a past
> call as well.
> My comments inline and perhaps German can also help us confirm whether
> they (all or partially) can be accomodated, with the resource it requires.
> On 2015/01/09 18:33, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>> I am reluctant to add more work ot the NRO secretariat (sorry German!), but I was wondering if we could make some improvements to the NRO CRISP webpage?
>> o "How to provide input"
>> Maybe there needs to be a clear header called "How to provide
>> input". At the moment, it is not clear to "newcomers", how and
>> where they can comment.
>> (We have now listed pointers to the ianxfer-list, but it might
>> not be clear that this is *the place* to send your input.)
> I agreed.
>> o Clear timeline and current deadline on the page
>> Currently the timeline is listed in a PDF with the title
>> "CRISP TELECONFERENCE DOCUMENT MATERIAL". If people come to
>> the page, I think it's important that they immediately can
>> see what the timelines are.
>> Can we add a clear "deadline for input to 2nd draft" to
>> the page?
> I agree. This can probably also move to where the latest document can be
>> o A separate, clearly visible "Latest draft" link
>> If we want input to this draft, maybe there needs to be a
>> clear link that stands out on the page in addition to the
>> one in the list at the bottom of the page.
> Indeed. In addition to the draft, all the latest documents. i.e., latest
> issues list and timeline.
>> o CRISP Charter -> less prominent
>> This is important, but I'm not sure if it needs to be almost
>> at the top of the page. Maybe it should be moved down or
>> shifted to a separate page?
>> o CRISP Team members -> less prominent
>> Again, important, but maybe that should be shifted to under
>> the information that is directly relevant to those who want
>> to participate in the process?
> I agree both the above information can go lower in the page, or a
> seperate page.
>> I realise that these might sound like rather detailed comments. But I think it is important that we
>> a) Make it as easy as possible for people to find the right information and provide their input
>> b) Leave a clear public archive of the process that show that we have done our job properly and in a transparent manner.
>> I am getting a few questions from members in the community about how, what, when and where, which indicates to me that maybe it's not all clear to everyone.
>> Happy to hear your thoughts on this!
> Thank you for raising this. As mentioned I agree with your reasoning,
> especially from the fact you are getting questions.
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CRISP