[CRISP-TEAM] Comment from Richard Hill Fwd: RE: [NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final Call for Comments

Nurani Nimpuno nurani at netnod.se
Fri Jan 9 09:24:20 CET 2015


On 9 jan 2015, at 09:22, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

>>> Agreed. We are not the RIRs and we are not lawyers.
>>> 
>>> However, it is of course assumed that the RIR's legal teams get 
>>> together and produce such a contract, before the transition takes place.
>> 
>> Perhaps we should say something like that in the document?
>> 
>>>> I personally feel it would be helpful if we could say a little more 
>>>> than this, such as the idea is to have the SLA completed before the 
>>>> transition and we are listing high level principles as its 
>>>> reference.  Then again, this may go back to the point discussed at 
>>>> the 9th call, we shouldn't mention anything we cannot be 
>>>> control/outside our role.
>> 
>> Oh, Izumi also suggested saying that in the document.
>> 
> 
> Good to know. Thanks Alan!

Yes I agree that this should be stated clearly in the document.
Nurani


> 
> 
> Izumi
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp





More information about the CRISP mailing list