[CRISP-TEAM] Comment from Richard Hill Fwd: RE: [NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final Call for Comments

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Fri Jan 9 07:25:42 CET 2015


Excellent point Mwendwa. Strongly agree.

Regarding your last point,

> We should also tell him
> the work of CRISP is compile community feedback that has reached
> consensus from the 5 RIRs.

that is my undestanding as well, and would like to reconfirm with CRISP
team members, so make sure our response sounds credible.


Izumi

On 2015/01/09 15:19, Mwendwa Kivuva wrote:
> 
> On 9 January 2015 at 00:48, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp 
> <mailto:izumi at nic.ad.jp>> wrote:
> 
>     3) Why the option of having NRO as an operator is not considered
>       - He says some support was expressed for this option in some RIR lists
>         Any region which observed this?
>         (I don't this was the case in the APNIC region. It may be possible
>         someone outside the region may have mention which I overlooked but
>         certainly not a level of notable support or a recognition.)
>       - He also asks for providing a reason why CRISP Team hasn't considered
>         this option. What are your thoughts?
> 
> 
> AFRINIC region too did not discuss having NRO as an operator but was 
> satisfied with the work of ICANN. The challenge of having NRO as an 
> operator and giving the IANA duties to one of the 5 RIRs will bring 
> disputes in our respective regions on which region is appropriate for 
> this task. This would be a very hard decision to reach consensus. It 
> would also raise major accountability issues. We should also tell him 
> the work of CRISP is compile community feedback that has reached 
> consensus from the 5 RIRs.
> 
> ______________________
> Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
> 
> "There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on 
> higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
> 





More information about the CRISP mailing list