[CRISP-TEAM] 2ND CRISP IANA PROPOSAL Draft - Updated 1440UTC
nurani at netnod.se
Thu Jan 8 16:59:26 CET 2015
On 8 jan 2015, at 16:21, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> I'm good with Alan's suggestion.
> On 2015/01/09 0:18, Alan Barrett wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>> I suggest to add a new paragraph at the end of section III.A.4, saying
>>> The Review Committee should be a team composed of
>>> representatives from each RIR region.
>> No! I meant "suitably qualified" representatives.
>> Then the entire section would read:
>> II.A.4. Establishment of a Review Committee
>> To ensure the service level defined in the proposed contract is maintained and provided by the IANA functions operator, the NRO EC will conduct periodic reviews of the service level of the IANA number resource functions that serves each RIR and their respective communities.
>> The NRO EC shall establish a Review Committee that will advise and assist the NRO EC in its periodic review. The Review Committee will, as needed, undertake a review of the level of service received from the IANA functions operator and report to the NRO EC any concerns regarding the performance of the IANA functions operator, including especially any observed failure or near-failure by the IANA functions operator to meet its contractual obligations under the proposed contract. Any such Review Committee will advise the NRO EC in its capacity solely to oversee the performance of the IANA number resource functions and the Review Committee���s advice and comment will be limited to the processes followed in the IANA functions operator���s performance under the proposed contract. Activities of the Review Committee shall be conducted in an open and transparent manner. Reports from the Review Committee shall be published.
>> The Review Committee should be a team composed of suitably qualified
>> representatives from each RIR region.
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP