[CRISP-TEAM] [NRO-IANAXFER] Contract details

[Izumi Okutani]

Now that we have the draft fixed and no changes related to this part,
I'll send this out to IANAXFER list.

Izumi

On 2015/01/08 15:59, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> 
> On 8 jan 2015, at 07:20, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>>> I would like to post this on the IANAXFER list, to clearly show we have incorporate the suggestion made by a community member.
>>
>> That looks fine.
> +1
> Nurani
> 
> 
>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>
>>>
>>> The CRISP Team discussed the suggestion raised on the mailing about keeping to high level principles in our proposal about the contract between IANA function operator and RIRs.
>>>
>>> There was consensus within the CRISP Team for this approach, and we plan to reflect it on the 2nd draft proposal to be published today, on 8th Jan 2015.
>>>
>>> In the other words, the second draft proposal will not describe whether the contract should have fixed term or not. This decision is to be made at the time of implementation, to consider the most appropriate option, based on the principles described in the proposal.
>>>
>>> I hope this clarifies considerations by the CRISP Team and we'll make an announcement on this list once we publish the second draft proposal.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Izumi Okutani
>>> CRISP Team
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>