[CRISP-TEAM] 2ND CRISP IANA PROPOSAL Draft - Updated 1440UTC
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Thu Jan 8 16:21:40 CET 2015
I'm good with Alan's suggestion.
On 2015/01/09 0:18, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Alan Barrett wrote:
>> I suggest to add a new paragraph at the end of section III.A.4, saying
>> The Review Committee should be a team composed of
>> representatives from each RIR region.
> No! I meant "suitably qualified" representatives.
> Then the entire section would read:
> II.A.4. Establishment of a Review Committee
> To ensure the service level defined in the proposed contract is
> maintained and provided by the IANA functions operator, the NRO EC will
> conduct periodic reviews of the service level of the IANA number
> resource functions that serves each RIR and their respective communities.
> The NRO EC shall establish a Review Committee that will advise and
> assist the NRO EC in its periodic review. The Review Committee will, as
> needed, undertake a review of the level of service received from the
> IANA functions operator and report to the NRO EC any concerns regarding
> the performance of the IANA functions operator, including especially any
> observed failure or near-failure by the IANA functions operator to meet
> its contractual obligations under the proposed contract. Any such Review
> Committee will advise the NRO EC in its capacity solely to oversee the
> performance of the IANA number resource functions and the Review
> Committee���s advice and comment will be limited to the processes
> followed in the IANA functions operator���s performance under the
> proposed contract. Activities of the Review Committee shall be conducted
> in an open and transparent manner. Reports from the Review Committee
> shall be published.
> The Review Committee should be a team composed of suitably qualified
> representatives from each RIR region.
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP