Michael Abejuela mabejuela at arin.net
Thu Jan 8 16:18:59 CET 2015

Thank you Alan,

I don¹t see this as a controversial point and will include in the text
unless I hear any objection in the next five minutes.

Michael R. Abejuela

Associate General Counsel


3635 Concorde Parkway

Suite 200

Chantilly, VA 20151

(703) 227-9875 (p)

(703) 263-0111 (f)

mabejuela at arin.net


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, copy, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

On 1/8/15, 10:18 AM, "Alan Barrett" <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>I suggest to add a new paragraph at the end of section III.A.4, saying
>>   The Review Committee should be a team composed of
>>   representatives from each RIR region.
>No!  I meant "suitably qualified" representatives.
>Then the entire section would read:
>II.A.4. Establishment of a Review Committee
>To ensure the service level defined in the proposed contract is
>maintained and provided by the IANA functions operator, the NRO EC
>will conduct periodic reviews of the service level of the IANA number
>resource functions that serves each RIR and their respective
>The NRO EC shall establish a Review Committee that will advise and
>assist the NRO EC in its periodic review. The Review Committee will,
>as needed, undertake a review of the level of service received from
>the IANA functions operator and report to the NRO EC any concerns
>regarding the performance of the IANA functions operator, including
>especially any observed failure or near-failure by the IANA functions
>operator to meet its contractual obligations under the proposed
>contract. Any such Review Committee will advise the NRO EC in its
>capacity solely to oversee the performance of the IANA number resource
>functions and the Review Committee¹s advice and comment will be
>limited to the processes followed in the IANA functions operator¹s
>performance under the proposed contract. Activities of the Review
>Committee shall be conducted in an open and transparent manner.
>Reports from the Review Committee shall be published.
>The Review Committee should be a team composed of suitably qualified
>representatives from each RIR region.

More information about the CRISP mailing list