[CRISP-TEAM] 2ND CRISP IANA PROPOSAL Draft - Updated 1440UTC

Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 8 16:18:01 CET 2015


On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Alan Barrett wrote:
>I suggest to add a new paragraph at the end of section III.A.4, saying
>just:
>
>   The Review Committee should be a team composed of
>   representatives from each RIR region.

No!  I meant "suitably qualified" representatives.

Then the entire section would read:

[[[

II.A.4. Establishment of a Review Committee

To ensure the service level defined in the proposed contract is 
maintained and provided by the IANA functions operator, the NRO EC 
will conduct periodic reviews of the service level of the IANA number 
resource functions that serves each RIR and their respective 
communities.

The NRO EC shall establish a Review Committee that will advise and 
assist the NRO EC in its periodic review. The Review Committee will, 
as needed, undertake a review of the level of service received from 
the IANA functions operator and report to the NRO EC any concerns 
regarding the performance of the IANA functions operator, including 
especially any observed failure or near-failure by the IANA functions 
operator to meet its contractual obligations under the proposed 
contract. Any such Review Committee will advise the NRO EC in its 
capacity solely to oversee the performance of the IANA number resource 
functions and the Review Committee’s advice and comment will be 
limited to the processes followed in the IANA functions operator’s 
performance under the proposed contract. Activities of the Review 
Committee shall be conducted in an open and transparent manner. 
Reports from the Review Committee shall be published.

The Review Committee should be a team composed of suitably qualified
representatives from each RIR region.

]]]




More information about the CRISP mailing list