[CRISP-TEAM] Updated spreadsheet

[Izumi Okutani]

Thanks Alan, very helpful.


For row E18,

I think we can delete "Discussed again on 8 Jan 2015, agreed to focus on
high level considerations, so this low level detail was removed."


Because the summary says:

"Review committee members should be selected by RIR communities,
similarly to NRO-NC/ASO-AC. They should not be appointed by NRO-EC."

and sufficient with:
""Completed. Discussed at the 8th call (5 Jan 2015). Agreed that the
process should be similar to apointment of NRO-NC/ASO-AC members.

See Section III ""Establishment of a Review Committee."""
"

(i.e., it doesn't appear to suggest low level details.)


Attached is the update version. Let me know if you have concerns.


Izumi




On 2015/01/08 23:51, Alan Barrett wrote:
> I have edited the spreadsheet to reflect the fact that we removed some
> details about the Review Team.
> 
> I started with the document from 
> <https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/NRODiscussionList_20150108.xlsx>, then 
> I edited it with change tracking, and saved it as 
> NRODiscussionList_20150108.2.redline.xlsx.  I attach the result.
> 
> After people check it, I think we should post it on the web page
> (but probably "accept all changes" and save it in a clean form).
> 
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NRODiscussionList_20150108.3.redline.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 105529 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150109/97d1381f/NRODiscussionList_20150108.3.redline.xlsx>