[CRISP-TEAM] 2ND CRISP IANA PROPOSAL Draft - CRISP Review

[Michael Abejuela]

Thank you for this e-mail, I can review and incorporate accordingly as
well.

Thanks!
-Michael

-- 
Michael R. Abejuela

Associate General Counsel

ARIN

3635 Concorde Parkway

Suite 200

Chantilly, VA 20151

(703) 227-9875 (p)

(703) 263-0111 (f)

mabejuela at arin.net

 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, copy, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.







On 1/8/15, 7:56 AM, "Nurani Nimpuno" <nurani at netnod.se> wrote:

>
>On 8 jan 2015, at 12:50, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>
>> On 2015/01/08 20:30, Alan Barrett wrote:
>>> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>>> I.A. A description of the service or activity
>>>> 
>>>> The IANA activities relevant to the number resources communities are
>>>>the
>>>> maintenance of the global Internet number resource registries,
>>>>including
>>>> the allocation of IPv4
>>>> addresses, IPv6 addresses, and Autonomous System Numbers (���ASNs���)
>>>> to the
>>>> Regional
>>>> Internet Registries (���RIRs���) as well as the delegation of
>>>>subdomains
>>>> below the ���INADDR.
>>>> ARPA��� and ���IP6.ARPA��� domains in accordance with the allocation
>>>> of IPv4 and
>>>> IPv6 addresses.
>>> 
>>> I support this change.  "Maintenance of the registries", not just
>>> Allocation of resources.
>>> 
>> 
>> +1.
>
>Agreed.
>
>>>> 2) If we agree with that I also suggest that we change one of the SLA
>>>> principles: "ii. Distribution of Internet Number Resources by the IANA
>>>> Operator to RIRs"
>>>> 
>>>> ii. Description of Services Provided by the IANA Operator to RIRs
>>>> 
>>>> Principle:
>>>> The IANA Operator will maintain the global Internet number resource
>>>> registries. The IANA Operator will distribute Internet number
>>>>Resources
>>>> to the RIRs in accordance with the specific processes and timelines
>>>> described in this section of the agreement. The IANA Operator will
>>>> delegate subdomains below the ���IN- ADDR.ARPA��� and ���IP6.ARPA���
>>>> domains in
>>>> accordance with the allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
>>> 
>>> I support this change.
>> 
>> + 1. Agree it's not only the number resources.
>
>Agreed.
>
>>>> 3) I also suggest a minor change to to  Section II.B.2 to make it more
>>>> clear (e.g. whose formation - may be read that ICANN provided services
>>>> since IANA's formation):
>>>> 
>>>> Section II.B.2
>>>> 
>>>> There is no contractual obligation directly to the Internet number
>>>> resource community for the IANA operator to provide IANA registry
>>>> services for the Internet number registries; IANA services for the
>>>> Internet number registries are provided by ICANN since its formation
>>>>as
>>>> a result of the NTIA IANA Functions contract and hence IANA services
>>>>for
>>>> the Internet number registries are presently subject to change per
>>>>that
>>>> agreement.
>>>> 
>>>> change to:
>>>> 
>>>> There is no contractual obligation directly to the Internet number
>>>> resource community for the IANA operator to provide IANA registry
>>>> services for the Internet number registries. ICANN has historically
>>>> provided IANA services for the Internet number registries under the
>>>> terms of the NTIA IANA Functions contract and therefore IANA services
>>>> for the Internet number registries are presently subject to change per
>>>> that agreement.
>>> 
>>> I agree that this change makes it clearer that we are talking about
>>> ICANN's formation, not IANA's formation.
>> 
>> Agreed. and they are distict, from history.
>
>Agreed.
>
>>>> 4) Finally, regarding I.C.�� What registries are involved in providing
>>>> the service or activity:
>>>> 
>>>>> [...] Delegation of subdomains below the ���IN-ADDR.ARPA��� and
>>>>> ���IP6.ARPA��� domain names also requires interaction with the .ARPA
>>>>> zone registry.
>>>> 
>>>> I am not sure that that delegation affects .ARPA. Maybe:
>>>> 
>>>> "[...] Delegation of subdomains below the ���IN-ADDR.ARPA��� and
>>>> ���IP6.ARPA���
>>>> domains in accordance with the allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses."
>>> 
>>> The question is specifically about which registries are affected. You
>>> seem to think that third-level or lower-level subdomains under
>>> IN-ADDR.ARPA or IP6.ARPA do not affect the ARPA registry, and you may
>>>be
>>> right (I don't know exactly where the boundary of the ARPA registry
>>>is),
>>> but I want to mention the ARPA registry just in case it's relevant.
>>> Would you be satisfied with this:
>>> 
>>>   Delegation of subdomains below the ���IN-ADDR.ARPA��� and
>>>���IP6.ARPA���
>>>   domain names may also require direct or indirect interaction with
>>>   the .ARPA registry.
>>> 
>>> ("requires" -> "may also require", add "direct or indirect", and use
>>>the
>>> phrase ".ARPA registry" for consistency with the www.iana.org page.)
>>> 
>> 
>> I'm OK with Alan's suggestion.
>
>I have seen that your discussion has continued on this so I will not
>comment on this issue here.
>Nurani
>
>
>> 
>> 
>> Izumi
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net
>https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp