[CRISP-TEAM] 2ND CRISP IANA PROPOSAL Draft - CRISP Review

[Nurani Nimpuno]

On 8 jan 2015, at 12:50, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

> On 2015/01/08 20:30, Alan Barrett wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>>> I.A. A description of the service or activity
>>> 
>>> The IANA activities relevant to the number resources communities are the
>>> maintenance of the global Internet number resource registries, including
>>> the allocation of IPv4
>>> addresses, IPv6 addresses, and Autonomous System Numbers (���ASNs���)
>>> to the
>>> Regional
>>> Internet Registries (���RIRs���) as well as the delegation of subdomains
>>> below the ���INADDR.
>>> ARPA��� and ���IP6.ARPA��� domains in accordance with the allocation
>>> of IPv4 and
>>> IPv6 addresses.
>> 
>> I support this change.  "Maintenance of the registries", not just
>> Allocation of resources.
>> 
> 
> +1.

Agreed.

>>> 2) If we agree with that I also suggest that we change one of the SLA
>>> principles: "ii. Distribution of Internet Number Resources by the IANA
>>> Operator to RIRs"
>>> 
>>> ii. Description of Services Provided by the IANA Operator to RIRs
>>> 
>>> Principle:
>>> The IANA Operator will maintain the global Internet number resource
>>> registries. The IANA Operator will distribute Internet number Resources
>>> to the RIRs in accordance with the specific processes and timelines
>>> described in this section of the agreement. The IANA Operator will
>>> delegate subdomains below the ���IN- ADDR.ARPA��� and ���IP6.ARPA���
>>> domains in
>>> accordance with the allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
>> 
>> I support this change.
> 
> + 1. Agree it's not only the number resources.

Agreed.

>>> 3) I also suggest a minor change to to  Section II.B.2 to make it more
>>> clear (e.g. whose formation - may be read that ICANN provided services
>>> since IANA's formation):
>>> 
>>> Section II.B.2
>>> 
>>> There is no contractual obligation directly to the Internet number
>>> resource community for the IANA operator to provide IANA registry
>>> services for the Internet number registries; IANA services for the
>>> Internet number registries are provided by ICANN since its formation as
>>> a result of the NTIA IANA Functions contract and hence IANA services for
>>> the Internet number registries are presently subject to change per that
>>> agreement.
>>> 
>>> change to:
>>> 
>>> There is no contractual obligation directly to the Internet number
>>> resource community for the IANA operator to provide IANA registry
>>> services for the Internet number registries. ICANN has historically
>>> provided IANA services for the Internet number registries under the
>>> terms of the NTIA IANA Functions contract and therefore IANA services
>>> for the Internet number registries are presently subject to change per
>>> that agreement.
>> 
>> I agree that this change makes it clearer that we are talking about
>> ICANN's formation, not IANA's formation.
> 
> Agreed. and they are distict, from history.

Agreed.

>>> 4) Finally, regarding I.C.�� What registries are involved in providing
>>> the service or activity:
>>> 
>>>> [...] Delegation of subdomains below the ���IN-ADDR.ARPA��� and
>>>> ���IP6.ARPA��� domain names also requires interaction with the .ARPA
>>>> zone registry.
>>> 
>>> I am not sure that that delegation affects .ARPA. Maybe:
>>> 
>>> "[...] Delegation of subdomains below the ���IN-ADDR.ARPA��� and
>>> ���IP6.ARPA���
>>> domains in accordance with the allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses."
>> 
>> The question is specifically about which registries are affected. You
>> seem to think that third-level or lower-level subdomains under
>> IN-ADDR.ARPA or IP6.ARPA do not affect the ARPA registry, and you may be
>> right (I don't know exactly where the boundary of the ARPA registry is),
>> but I want to mention the ARPA registry just in case it's relevant.
>> Would you be satisfied with this:
>> 
>>   Delegation of subdomains below the ���IN-ADDR.ARPA��� and ���IP6.ARPA���
>>   domain names may also require direct or indirect interaction with
>>   the .ARPA registry.
>> 
>> ("requires" -> "may also require", add "direct or indirect", and use the
>> phrase ".ARPA registry" for consistency with the www.iana.org page.)
>> 
> 
> I'm OK with Alan's suggestion.

I have seen that your discussion has continued on this so I will not comment on this issue here.
Nurani


> 
> 
> Izumi
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp