[CRISP-TEAM] 2ND CRISP IANA PROPOSAL Draft - CRISP Review
apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 8 13:47:43 CET 2015
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>Thank you for the explanation. I see your point now.
>There is indeed a case when such interaction is required - when
>“IN-ADDR.ARPA” and “IP6.ARPA” are re-delegated or moved to another DNS
>servers, but it has nothing to do with the "delegation of subdomains
>below...". How about the following:
>Provision of the reverse DNS services in “IN-ADDR.ARPA” and “IP6.ARPA”
>domains may also require direct or indirect interaction with the .ARPA
Yes, that text is fine. "Provision of reverse DNS services" instead of
"delegation of subdomains". Thank you.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP