[CRISP-TEAM] 2ND CRISP IANA PROPOSAL Draft - CRISP Review

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Thu Jan 8 12:50:18 CET 2015


On 2015/01/08 20:30, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> I.A. A description of the service or activity
>>
>> The IANA activities relevant to the number resources communities are the
>> maintenance of the global Internet number resource registries, including
>> the allocation of IPv4
>> addresses, IPv6 addresses, and Autonomous System Numbers (���ASNs���)
>> to the
>> Regional
>> Internet Registries (���RIRs���) as well as the delegation of subdomains
>> below the ���INADDR.
>> ARPA��� and ���IP6.ARPA��� domains in accordance with the allocation
>> of IPv4 and
>> IPv6 addresses.
>
> I support this change.  "Maintenance of the registries", not just
> Allocation of resources.
>

+1.


>> 2) If we agree with that I also suggest that we change one of the SLA
>> principles: "ii. Distribution of Internet Number Resources by the IANA
>> Operator to RIRs"
>>
>> ii. Description of Services Provided by the IANA Operator to RIRs
>>
>> Principle:
>> The IANA Operator will maintain the global Internet number resource
>> registries. The IANA Operator will distribute Internet number Resources
>> to the RIRs in accordance with the specific processes and timelines
>> described in this section of the agreement. The IANA Operator will
>> delegate subdomains below the ���IN- ADDR.ARPA��� and ���IP6.ARPA���
>> domains in
>> accordance with the allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
>
> I support this change.

+ 1. Agree it's not only the number resources.

>> 3) I also suggest a minor change to to  Section II.B.2 to make it more
>> clear (e.g. whose formation - may be read that ICANN provided services
>> since IANA's formation):
>>
>> Section II.B.2
>>
>> There is no contractual obligation directly to the Internet number
>> resource community for the IANA operator to provide IANA registry
>> services for the Internet number registries; IANA services for the
>> Internet number registries are provided by ICANN since its formation as
>> a result of the NTIA IANA Functions contract and hence IANA services for
>> the Internet number registries are presently subject to change per that
>> agreement.
>>
>> change to:
>>
>> There is no contractual obligation directly to the Internet number
>> resource community for the IANA operator to provide IANA registry
>> services for the Internet number registries. ICANN has historically
>> provided IANA services for the Internet number registries under the
>> terms of the NTIA IANA Functions contract and therefore IANA services
>> for the Internet number registries are presently subject to change per
>> that agreement.
>
> I agree that this change makes it clearer that we are talking about
> ICANN's formation, not IANA's formation.

Agreed. and they are distict, from history.

>> 4) Finally, regarding I.C.�� What registries are involved in providing
>> the service or activity:
>>
>>> [...] Delegation of subdomains below the ���IN-ADDR.ARPA��� and
>>> ���IP6.ARPA��� domain names also requires interaction with the .ARPA
>>> zone registry.
>>
>> I am not sure that that delegation affects .ARPA. Maybe:
>>
>> "[...] Delegation of subdomains below the ���IN-ADDR.ARPA��� and
>> ���IP6.ARPA���
>> domains in accordance with the allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses."
>
> The question is specifically about which registries are affected. You
> seem to think that third-level or lower-level subdomains under
> IN-ADDR.ARPA or IP6.ARPA do not affect the ARPA registry, and you may be
> right (I don't know exactly where the boundary of the ARPA registry is),
> but I want to mention the ARPA registry just in case it's relevant.
> Would you be satisfied with this:
>
>    Delegation of subdomains below the ���IN-ADDR.ARPA��� and ���IP6.ARPA���
>    domain names may also require direct or indirect interaction with
>    the .ARPA registry.
>
> ("requires" -> "may also require", add "direct or indirect", and use the
> phrase ".ARPA registry" for consistency with the www.iana.org page.)
>

I'm OK with Alan's suggestion.


Izumi





More information about the CRISP mailing list