[CRISP-TEAM] 2ND CRISP IANA PROPOSAL Draft - CRISP Review
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Thu Jan 8 11:47:45 CET 2015
On 2015/01/08 17:58, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Michael Abejuela wrote:
>> I also proposed a numbering scheme that may or may not seem awkward to
>> some but appreciate any feedback on this item as well.
> Your numbering scheme is fine. I usually prefer hierarchical arabic
> numbers, like "1.2.3", but the RFP that we had to work from already uses
> roman and alphabetic numbering for the first two levels, so we have to
> stick with that.
Agreed. I just made one comment related to this, for Section III.
> I might prefer to break long sub-sections into smaller sub-sub-sections
> with another level of numbering, but that's not critical.
>> One editorial item I did incorporate but ask for your comment or
>> approval is in the section now labeled II.B.3.ii Regional Internet
>> Registries ��� second paragraph, last sentence where I have removed
>> ���specific funding or operational resolutions��� and in its place put
>> ���matters related to the respective RIR.��� I made this language
>> more general to be in line with my understanding of all the RIRs and
>> to avoid any confusion that there are specific funding or operational
>> resolutions for which members cast votes on a regular basis.
> That's fine.
Yes. Fine by me as well.
>> p.s. One item I recall there being a removal of text had to do with
>> the discussion of the issue of how detailed provisions about the
>> contract would be included but I did not remove any such text. It may
>> have already been addressed in the edits but I wanted to confirm with
>> the team just in case. Thanks.
> I am not sure which text you are referring to.
This is already incorporated as a part of text suggestion from Paul and
That's my understanding at least, and please correct me if I'm wrong
Paul and Nurani.
More information about the CRISP