[CRISP-TEAM] 2ND CRISP IANA PROPOSAL Draft - CRISP Review

[Nurani Nimpuno]

On 8 jan 2015, at 10:48, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>> 2. URL references
>> We have used a variety of different methods to include URL pointers throughout the document. It might be a little late to try to tidy that up at this stage (and it's not paramount), but would we want to include footnotes in the text for parts that refer to the URLs we list under "Relevant links"? (To make the document clearer and easier to read.)
>> 
>> This is partly a question for the group, but also really a question for Michael as it entails a bit of work to insert relevant footnote numbers in the text.
>> 
>> Perhaps, the most reasonable approach if we decide to do this, is to do it in the tidying-up phase, after the publication of the second draft (8-12 Jan).
> 
> I like consistency.  I notice things like a sentence with only one space
> after the full stop while other sentences have two spaces, or vice
> versa.

Yes, there are quite a few things like that in there. It would be nice if we could spend some time after the publication of the second draft, to tidy some of these things up. 

> There's probably not time, in the next few hours, to make all the URL
> references use consistent styles, or to convert them to footnotes, but
> I think we can address that in between the second draft and the final
> version.

Yes, agreed. This is what this period is for.

> However, if we are planning to move things to footnotes later, then we
> should probably say so in today's announcement.

Yes, probably. 
Nurani 

> 
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp