Alan Barrett apb at cequrux.com
Thu Jan 8 10:48:31 CET 2015

On Thu, 08 Jan 2015, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
> 2. URL references
> We have used a variety of different methods to include URL 
> pointers throughout the document. It might be a little late to 
> try to tidy that up at this stage (and it's not paramount), but 
> would we want to include footnotes in the text for parts that 
> refer to the URLs we list under "Relevant links"? (To make the 
> document clearer and easier to read.)
> This is partly a question for the group, but also really a 
> question for Michael as it entails a bit of work to insert 
> relevant footnote numbers in the text.
> Perhaps, the most reasonable approach if we decide to do this, 
> is to do it in the tidying-up phase, after the publication of 
> the second draft (8-12 Jan).

I like consistency.  I notice things like a sentence with only one space
after the full stop while other sentences have two spaces, or vice

There's probably not time, in the next few hours, to make all the URL
references use consistent styles, or to convert them to footnotes, but
I think we can address that in between the second draft and the final

However, if we are planning to move things to footnotes later, then we
should probably say so in today's announcement.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

More information about the CRISP mailing list