[CRISP-TEAM] Community engagement in developing SLA Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Thank you for the feedback and update on CRISP Team Status

[Nurani Nimpuno]

I think that's a good response.
Nurani


On 7 jan 2015, at 11:57, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

> Sounds very reasonable to me. I support to incorporate in the propsal as
> well. Thank you Andrei.
> 
> Thoughts from others?
> 
> After comfirming at the call today, I suggest we share our position on
> the IANAXFER list shortly after that, so that we can hear additional
> feedback if there is any.
> 
> 
> Izumi
> 
> On 2015/01/07 19:49, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> Izumi, team,
>> 
>> Izumi Okutani wrote on 07/01/15 11:05:
>>> CRISP Team,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The second point raised is on Community engagement in developing SLA
>>> 
>>> "May i know how/if the CRISP intend to engage the community in the
>>> development of the contract and SLA?"
>>> 
>>> It is not the scope of CRISP Team to take a lead about SLA ofcourse but
>>> I think the point of the question is if there will be any community
>>> engagement in the development of the contract.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> What are your thoughts on this?
>>> 
>> 
>> I agree that this is outside the scope, since this proposal is concerned
>> with high-level requirements and implementation of these will be
>> delegated to the RIRs. But also agree that we should respond to this
>> question. How about:
>> 
>> The CRISP team is essentially tasking the RIR staff with developing the
>> text of the agreement, but we assume and would strongly encourage the
>> RIR staff to do this in a transparent manner that engages the community
>> throughout the process.
>> 
>> That could be the reply to the list, and could even (with some
>> massaging) be included in the proposal if people felt that was useful.
>> 
>> Andrei
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Izumi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Thank you for the feedback and update on
>>> CRISP Team Status
>>> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:46:30 +0900
>>> From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
>>> To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
>>> CC: ianaxfer at nro.net <ianaxfer at nro.net>
>>> 
>>> Dear Seun,
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> - I had made suggestion about process of building the review team i.e the
>>>> formation, charter et all be determined before the transition is
>>> completed.
>>>> May i know what the CRISP team decided about this?
>>>> - May i know how/if the CRISP intend to engage the community in the
>>>> development of the contract and SLA?
>>> 
>>> We haven't discussed on these points since they appear to be more
>>> detailed than what we are currenting planning to cover in our propsal to
>>> ICG.
>>> 
>>> However, I note you are interested to confirm about these points and
>>> I'll raise it within CRISP team.
>>> 
>>> Thank you for taking a look into our status and raising what was not
>>> clear to you.
>>> 
>>> If there is anyone else who feels your comments have not been considered
>>> by CRISP Team from the spreadsheet I shared, it's helpful if you could
>>> share it here. Thanks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Izumi
>>> 
>>> On 2015/01/07 18:21, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>>> Dear Izumi,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for the update. I have just 2 minor comments below:
>>>> 
>>>> - I had made suggestion about process of building the review team i.e the
>>>> formation, charter et all be determined before the transition is completed.
>>>> May i know what the CRISP team decided about this?
>>>> - May i know how/if the CRISP intend to engage the community in the
>>>> development of the contract and SLA?
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> CRISP Team would like to thank everyone who have provided your inputs to
>>>>> the first draft of our proposal.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We have closed comments for the first draft, and completed to form CRISP
>>>>> Team's position on all issues express on <ianaxfer at nro.net> mailing list
>>>>> at the 8th CRISP Team call, at UTC13:00 Mon 5th Jan.
>>>>> 
>>>>> CRISP Team is now working to publish the second draft, which is planned
>>>>> to be published on Thu 8th Jan. We will make an announcement on this
>>>>> mailing list, and call for comments from the global community once it is
>>>>> published, as we did for the first draft.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In the meantime, attached is the status list of issue raised on
>>>>> <ianaxfer at nro.net> for you to confirm status of CRISP Team
>>>>> considerations. Please note this is to be updated as our work progresses.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We are planning to publish the updated issues status list when we
>>>>> publish our second draft.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you once again for taking your time to review the first draft of
>>>>> our proposal and sharing your views.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Izumi Okutani
>>>>> CRISP Team Chair
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ianaxfer mailing list
>>>>> ianaxfer at nro.net
>>>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp