[CRISP-TEAM] CRISP proposal Section VI. Community Process

[Nurani Nimpuno]

Thank you very much Andrei and Paul for your comments. They all make sense to me as well. 

Please find attached a new version with your suggestions incorporated.

Kind regards,

Nurani

 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: VI.Community Process-CRISP-Proposal-20150107-v.1.2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 167891 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.nro.net/pipermail/crisp/attachments/20150107/470cffaa/VI.CommunityProcess-CRISP-Proposal-20150107-v.1.2.docx>
-------------- next part --------------




On 7 jan 2015, at 11:17, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:

> I strongly agree with Andrei's last point and support his text.
> I'm also good on the other two points raised.
> 
> 
> Izumi
> 
> 
> On 2015/01/07 18:50, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>> Nurani, thank you for putting this together. Looks really good.
>> 
>> I have a couple of points, the first is editorial and other two are more
>> substantive.
>> 
>>> The Internet numbers community process can be characterized as "bottom-up", transparent and inclusive
>> 
>> Perhaps simply "The Internet numbers community process is "bottom-up",
>> transparent and inclusive"
>> 
>>> Existing processes and communication channels could therefore be used for the IANA stewardship transition discussions
>> 
>> I am not sure other community used their formal PDPs, we certainly
>> didn't use it in RIPE. The sentence may imply that we did. Perhaps:
>> 
>> Existing mechanisms and communication channels could therefore be used
>> for the IANA stewardship transition discussions
>> 
>>> The CRISP team believes that the global community has reached a consensus position on each of these issues, as reflected in the content of the current proposal and is well supported by the global numbering community
>> 
>> This is the key sentence for the whole section, IMO and we need to make
>> it as strong as possible. Maybe something along the lines:
>> 
>> There was clear agreement from the global community on positions
>> regarding each of these issues, as reflected in the content of the
>> current proposal. The CRISP Team believes therefore that the current
>> proposal fully reflects the consensus of the global numbering community.
>> 
>> Andrei
>> 
>> 
>> Nurani Nimpuno wrote on 07/01/15 08:05:
>>> Thank you very much for your input Craig and Izumi.
>>> 
>>> Please find attached a new version with your comments included.
>>> 
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Nurani
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 7 jan 2015, at 07:56, Craig Ng <craig at apnic.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks very much Nurani.
>>>> 
>>>> Please use the text below for paragraph 2 of your comments below, for
>>>> APNIC's description of the CRISP team selection process.
>>>> 
>>>> Craig
>>>> 
>>>> -----
>>>> On 23 October 2014, through a post to the APNIC IANAxfer mailing list,
>>>> APNIC sought volunteers from the Asia Pacific community to nominate to
>>>> join the CRISP team. The nominees were asked to provide information about
>>>> their qualifications and interest to the APNIC Executive Council for its
>>>> consideration. The nomination period was open for two weeks. On 12
>>>> November 2014, the APNIC Executive Council appointed Izumi Okutani and
>>>> Dr Govind as its CRISP community members, and Craig Ng as its non-voting
>>>> staff member to the CRISP team.
>>>> 
>>>> The information was also posted on APNIC's IANA oversight transition
>>>> website:
>>>> 
>>>> APNIC EC announces CRISP Team appointees
>>>> APNIC EC seeks nominations for CRISP Team
>>>> http://www.apnic.net/community/iana-transition
>>>> 
>>>> -----
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 7/01/2015 9:16 am, "Nurani Nimpuno" <nurani at netnod.se> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please find attached an updated text for Section VI. Community Process.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have incorporated the points that Izumi sent me, but due to timezone
>>>>> differences she hasn't been able to review this draft before circulation.
>>>>> We agreed that we should prioritise circulating the draft within the team
>>>>> as soon as possible, given the short timeline.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have enabled track changes so it is easy to review the changes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Three quick comments:
>>>>> 1. I have not touched the sections that describe each RIR's process,
>>>>> apart from some very minor tidying.
>>>>> 2. Please note that both the AfriNIC and APNIC texts need to include a
>>>>> short description of the CRISP team selection process.
>>>>> 3. The LACNIC and ARIN processes should be inserted. (Please don't forget
>>>>> to include the CRISP team selection process for your region.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Nurani
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CRISP mailing list
>>> CRISP at nro.net
>>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CRISP mailing list
>> CRISP at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp