[CRISP-TEAM] Process of Buidling Review Team Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Thank you for the feedback and update on CRISP Team Status

[Izumi Okutani]

CRISP Team,


As you can see, two points were raised on the IANAXFER list asking for
status of our consideration.

First point is on the process of building the review team i.e the
formation, charter et all be determined before the transition.

I don't see a strong issue about incorporating this point in our
proposal as

 - It simply says what need to be done before the transition takes
   place.
 - It doesn't seem to be too difficult, given we will have agreed to
   have similar proces as NRO NC.

Does anyone have concerns about incorporating it?

Izumi

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Thank you for the feedback and update on
CRISP Team Status
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:46:30 +0900
From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
To: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
CC: ianaxfer at nro.net <ianaxfer at nro.net>

Dear Seun,


> - I had made suggestion about process of building the review team i.e the
> formation, charter et all be determined before the transition is
completed.
> May i know what the CRISP team decided about this?
> - May i know how/if the CRISP intend to engage the community in the
> development of the contract and SLA?

We haven't discussed on these points since they appear to be more
detailed than what we are currenting planning to cover in our propsal to
ICG.

However, I note you are interested to confirm about these points and
I'll raise it within CRISP team.

Thank you for taking a look into our status and raising what was not
clear to you.

If there is anyone else who feels your comments have not been considered
by CRISP Team from the spreadsheet I shared, it's helpful if you could
share it here. Thanks.


Regards,
Izumi

On 2015/01/07 18:21, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Dear Izumi,
> 
> Thanks for the update. I have just 2 minor comments below:
> 
> - I had made suggestion about process of building the review team i.e the
> formation, charter et all be determined before the transition is completed.
> May i know what the CRISP team decided about this?
> - May i know how/if the CRISP intend to engage the community in the
> development of the contract and SLA?
> 
> Regards
> 
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>>
>> CRISP Team would like to thank everyone who have provided your inputs to
>> the first draft of our proposal.
>>
>> We have closed comments for the first draft, and completed to form CRISP
>> Team's position on all issues express on <ianaxfer at nro.net> mailing list
>> at the 8th CRISP Team call, at UTC13:00 Mon 5th Jan.
>>
>> CRISP Team is now working to publish the second draft, which is planned
>> to be published on Thu 8th Jan. We will make an announcement on this
>> mailing list, and call for comments from the global community once it is
>> published, as we did for the first draft.
>>
>> In the meantime, attached is the status list of issue raised on
>> <ianaxfer at nro.net> for you to confirm status of CRISP Team
>> considerations. Please note this is to be updated as our work progresses.
>>
>> We are planning to publish the updated issues status list when we
>> publish our second draft.
>>
>> Thank you once again for taking your time to review the first draft of
>> our proposal and sharing your views.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Izumi Okutani
>> CRISP Team Chair
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ianaxfer mailing list
>> ianaxfer at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>>
>>
> 
>