[CRISP-TEAM] [Call for comments] Maximum Review Interval Term to be 3 years
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Wed Jan 7 08:24:43 CET 2015
Alan and CRISP Team,
> I suggested three years in a message on 16 December, and did not receive
> any comments. This interval is not based on any existing practice,
I see and noted. I must have overlooked this message. My apologies.
> is simply what I thought would be reasonable.
> I note that the the existing NTIA/ICANN IANA contract has a duration of
> three years, and that the ICANN bylaws require review of ICANN
> structures (including the ASO) at least every five years.
> Perhaps it would make sense to tie reviews to contract renewals?
> Something like this:
> Such reviews shall be conducted at some time during the last 12 months
> of the term of the proposed contract or its successors, or at any time
> on request from the Boards of at least two of the RIRs, and shall in any
> case be conducted not less than once every three years.
Excellent. This makes sense to me!
I'm comfortable that we can explain the rationale for three years with
this text, while I continue to welcome feeback from CRISP Team.
More information about the CRISP