[CRISP-TEAM] Review Committee changes

[Alan Barrett]

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> I also liked where you placed to move the "Appointment of a 
> different contractor". It does make it less contradictory than 
> placing under no change in operartor.

Oh, I did not realise that I had not placed the paragraph where 
you suggested.  I have looked at it again, and I agree that 
this paragraph (dealing with a possible future transition to a 
different IANA operator) is best under the section dealing with 
the contract, which is where I placed it.

--apb (Alan Barrett)