[CRISP-TEAM] Review Committee changes
apb at cequrux.com
Wed Jan 7 08:11:52 CET 2015
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
> I also liked where you placed to move the "Appointment of a
> different contractor". It does make it less contradictory than
> placing under no change in operartor.
Oh, I did not realise that I had not placed the paragraph where
you suggested. I have looked at it again, and I agree that
this paragraph (dealing with a possible future transition to a
different IANA operator) is best under the section dealing with
the contract, which is where I placed it.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the CRISP