[CRISP-TEAM] Review Committee changes
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Wed Jan 7 07:27:33 CET 2015
Thank you Alan. This looks good to me.
I thought the way you re-structured the paragraph made it easier to read
with concept first then details.
I also liked where you placed to move the "Appointment of a different
contractor". It does make it less contradictory than placing under no
change in operartor.
Thanks Alan for incorporating my feeback.
On 2015/01/07 15:16, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> Suggested text:
>> 1. Added the part marked in *
>> The NRO EC shall establish a Review Committee that will advise and
>> assist the NRO EC in its periodic review. *Review Committee selection
>> and process willl be conducted in an open and transparent manner.*
> I made several editorial changes in this area, mostly related to
> changing the order of sentences, to keep the composition of the review
> committee separate from the activities of the review committee.
> I have added "Activities of the Review Committee shall be conducted in
> an open and transparent manner." I already had "two (2) of the members
> shall be selected via an open, accessible, documented and transparent
> procedure by the community of the RIR".
> I have not added a requirement for each RIR Board to use an open and
> transparent process in appointing their one member, because the
> corresponding process for the NRO NC does not have such a requirement
> (see section 7 of the MoU which created the NRO,
> New text:
> Establishment of a Review Committee
> To ensure the service level defined in the proposed contract is
> maintained and provided by the IANA functions operator, the NRO EC will
> conduct periodic reviews of the service level of the IANA number
> resource functions that serves each RIR and their respective
> communities. Such reviews shall be conducted not less than once every
> three (3) years, and more frequently on request from the Boards of at
> least two of the RIRs.
> The NRO EC shall establish a Review Committee that will advise and
> assist the NRO EC in its periodic review. The Review Committee will, as
> needed, undertake a review of the level of service received from the
> IANA functions operator and report to the NRO EC any concerns regarding
> the performance of the IANA functions operator, including especially any
> observed failure or near-failure by the IANA functions operator to meet
> its contractual obligations under the proposed contract. Any such
> Review Committee will advise the NRO EC in its capacity solely to
> oversee the performance of the IANA number resource functions and the
> Review Committee���s advice and comment will be limited to the processes
> followed in the IANA functions operator���s performance under the
> proposed contract. Activities of the Review Committee shall be
> conducted in an open and transparent manner. Reports from the Review
> Committee shall be published.
> The Review Committee should be a team composed of three (3) suitably
> qualified representatives from each RIR region. Within each RIR region,
> one (1) of the Review Committee members shall be appointed by the Board
> of the RIR, and two (2) of the members shall be selected via an open,
> accessible, documented and transparent procedure by the community of the
> RIR. This is similar to the way members of the NRO NC are appointed or
> selected, and it is expected that each RIR will develop its own
> procedures for this purpose.
>> 2. Moved text from "Appointment of a different contractor"" in the
>> last parahgraph and added the part marked in *
>> * While there is no concrete needs nor plan at this point,* if the NRO
>> EC determines *in the future* that the IANA functions related to number
>> resources should be transferred to a different contractor, then
>> selection of a new contractor shall be conducted in a fair, open and
>> transparent process, in line with applicable industry best practices and
>> standards. Associated requests for proposals, responses, and the
>> contract itself, shall be published.
> I moved that paragraph as you suggested, and made minor editorial
> New text (a new paragraph at the end of "Contract and Service level
> agreement with the IANA functions operator on number resources", just
> before "Establishment of a Review Committee"):
> While there are no concrete needs or plans at this point, the NRO EC may
> in the future determine that the IANA functions related to number
> resources should be transferred to a different contractor. In such a
> case, selection of a new contractor shall be conducted in a fair, open
> and transparent process, in line with applicable industry best practices
> and standards. Associated requests for proposals, responses, and the
> contract itself, shall be published.
> I attach a .docx file with change tracking.
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
More information about the CRISP