[CRISP-TEAM] [Call for comments] Maximum Review Interval Term to be 3 years (was: Re: Review Committee changes)

Izumi Okutani izumi at nic.ad.jp
Wed Jan 7 04:45:16 CET 2015


Please provide your feedback whether :

 - You agree to define the maximun interval of review as 3 years, which
   can be shortened based on defined process.

  " Such reviews shall be conducted not less than once every three (3)
    years, and more frequently on request from the Boards of at least
    two of the RIRs."

To Alan,

We also want to be prepared for rationale on why we think is three is
good, and not other period, such as one, two, five years, etc.

Would you help me clarify whether this is based on some existing
mechanism/practice as a reference, or this is what you feel is reasonable?

If it's the former, I think it would make it simple to explain when
receive clarifications/suggestions for changes on the IANAXFER list.


On 2015/01/06 21:03, Alan Barrett wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2015, Izumi Okutani wrote:
>> I realised Alan did volunteer to work on this part. Thank you Alan for
>> volunteering, in addition to other sections you have volunteered to work
>> on text. I really appreciate it.
>>>> To follow up from the 8th call, below are the principles I had 
>>>> suggested
>>>> to incorporate in the 2nd draft.
>>>>>> - The review report will be publicly disclosed
>>>>>> - the review committee selection and process conducted in an open and
>>>>>>    transparent manner.
>>>>>> - If the NRO EC determines that a change is needed with the IANA
>>>>>>    numbers function contract; the RFP for a new contractor will be
>>>>>>    conducted in a fair, open and transparent process in line with
>>>>>>    applicable industry best practices and standards.
>>>> In addition, in regards to the interval of the review, Alan has made a
>>>> suggestion to define the maximum interval but allow to shorten the
>>>> inverval of the review as needed.
> I have made several changes relating to the composition of the review 
> committee, the frequency of review, and the process for selecting a new 
> contractor.
> I attach a .docx file with the changes in redline form.  I based my 
> changes on the file "CRISP IANA PROPOSAL Draft 24122014-IPR-issues.docx" 
> that was recently shared by Andrei.
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> _______________________________________________
> CRISP mailing list
> CRISP at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/crisp

More information about the CRISP mailing list