[CRISP-TEAM] Draft text in the response reflecting the IPR issues

[Izumi Okutani]

Andrei and CRISP Team,


I think this captures the point we agreed very well. Thank you for this
excellent texts.

I also found the additions you made were helpful, including adding
captions before each paragraph which describes each element of our proposal.

As related to a point raised on IANAXFER, I wonder if we want to
describe our acknowlegement that transfer to IETF Trust is something
which needs coordination with other communities such as:

---
We acknowlegement that transfer to IETF Trust needs coordination with
other communities of IANA functions, namely for protocol parameters and
names.
---

If there is a reason you feel we shouldn't describe it, I'd be
interested to hear and not a must to include in that case.


Izumi


On 2015/01/06 18:20, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> Colleagues,
> 
> Please find attached a red-lined version of the latest draft that 
> includes the IPR issues. Please note that while the bulk of the 
> amendments is in the section III, I felt the need to describe the 
> dependencies on IANA/IANA.ORG in section I (otherwise - why do we
> care?).
> 
> You will notice that along with these amendments I made some 
> restructuring of section III - introducing subsections corresponding
> to the main elements of the proposal - to make it more readable.
> 
> Your feedback is welcome.
> 
> Andrei
> 
> 
> 
> Izumi Okutani wrote on 02/01/15 17:09:
>> Just as a recap of the 6th call -
>> 
>> * No objections expressed to Andrei's summary, including
>> intellectual property rights of IANA.ORG is to be held by the IETF 
>> * Andrei to communicate on the IANAXFER list based on the summary
>> and see whether there are no concerns about this direction * Andrei
>> to share the draft proposed text to reflect in the proposal to ICG
>> 
>> 
>> Izumi