[CRISP-TEAM] Fine-grained numbering

Michael Abejuela mabejuela at arin.net
Tue Jan 6 18:52:59 CET 2015

Agreed, it would be much easier that way and I can insert/propose a
numbering scheme when updating the second draft for community review.

Michael R. Abejuela

Associate General Counsel


3635 Concorde Parkway

Suite 200

Chantilly, VA 20151

(703) 227-9875 (p)

(703) 263-0111 (f)

mabejuela at arin.net


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, copy, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited.   If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

On 1/6/15, 12:48 PM, "Alan Barrett" <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:

>In our second draft proposal, please could we have fine-grained section
>numbering.  I'd like to have no more than two or three paraghraphs under
>each numbered section (and introduce more levels of numbering hierarchy
>as necessary to make this possible), so that people can refer to a
>particular paragraph by giving its number.  It's much easier to refer
>to "Section 1.2.3" than "The fourth paragraph on page 5" or "The second
>paragraph under the XXX subheading in section 2".
>--apb (Alan Barrett)
>CRISP mailing list
>CRISP at nro.net

More information about the CRISP mailing list