[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Re: Draft response/position: IANA IPR issues
robachevsky at isoc.org
Tue Jan 6 17:57:40 CET 2015
Alan Barrett wrote on 06/01/15 17:42:
>> "It is also the expectation of the RIR communities that non-public
>> information related to the number resource registries [and
>> corresponding services, including the provision of reverse DNS
>> delegation in IN-ADDR.ARPA and IP6.ARPA] is managed by the appropriate
>> Would this address the issue you brought up?
> That's very close. I think it still needs something about transition to
> a new operator.
All right, how about the following (full text):
It is important that through the stewardship transition the IPR status
of the registries is clear and ensures free unlimited access to the
public registry data. It is the expectation of the RIR communities that
the public number resource registries are in the public domain.
It is also the expectation of the RIR communities that non-public
information related to the IANA number resource registries and
corresponding services, including the provision of reverse DNS
delegation in IN-ADDR.ARPA and IP6.ARPA, is managed by the IANA operator
and will be transferred to its successor(s) along with relevant rights.
It is the preference of the RIR communities that all relevant parties
acknowledge that fact as part of the transition.
More information about the CRISP