[CRISP-TEAM] Additional questions from the ICG on the numbers proposal
robachevsky at isoc.org
Fri Feb 27 14:22:21 CET 2015
Alan Barrett wrote on 27/02/15 13:28:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Nurani Nimpuno wrote:
>> Fully agree with Alan's comments. As I read them, they are inline the
>> suggested drafted text by Izumi.
>> (Correct me if I'm wrong Alan.)
> Yes, my comments are in line with Izumi's draft text. I think I lean
> more towards quoting relevant portions of the proposal, and less towards
> adding additional commentary.
Alan, I like the brevity of the comments and agree with them.
One thing, you suggest:
> In the event that different IANA operators are chosen by different communities, then significant coordination may be required to ensure stability.
I think "significant" and "stability" could raise an unnecessary alarm.
In the event that different IANA operators are chosen by different
communities, then coordination will be required to ensure coherency (of
IANA registry system/IANA operations).
More information about the CRISP