[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Question from the ICG
izumi at nic.ad.jp
Fri Feb 20 11:06:04 CET 2015
Thanks Alan, John Nurani and Andrei for your feedback.
I like Alan's suggestions as well - thank you.
I agree with Andrei's additional suggested change. That is more in line
with the state of the discussions with the community and cannnot totally
commit to the change at this stage.
Today has been so hecktick full of meetings, so I will take a look in
details around UTC15:00 and share the updated draft.
On 2015/02/20 17:39, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
> I support Alan's suggestions, modulo one sentence:
> Alan Barrett wrote on 19/02/15 12:07:
>> We do not observe incompatibilities between the proposals from
>> the numbers and protocol parameters communities, for reasons
>> given below. However, if they are indeed incompatible, then
>> the numbers community would be willing to modify our proposal.
> I think it should read:
> ... the numbers community would be willing to consider modifying our
More information about the CRISP