[CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: Re: [Ianaplan] Question from the ICG

[Andrei Robachevsky]

Alan Barrett wrote on 11/02/15 10:45:
>>  - Do not see the need to change the proposal
>>  - We make a joint statement with the IETF  to submit to the
>>    ICG that we do not observe inconsistencies for the reasons
>>    explained above
> 
> The ICG didn't ask us to work it out, they asked a very specific question:
> 
>    "If these aspects of the proposals are perceived as
>    incompatible would the numbers and protocol parameters
>    communities be willing to modify their proposals to reconcile
>    them?"
> 
> I think the answer to that specific question is "Yes, if there is an
> incompatibility then we would be willing to modify the proposal."

Strictly speaking this will depend on whether the community is able to
reach consensus regarding these modifications. So we cannot say simply
Yes. I like Izumi's proposal better.

We can ask the community for clarification, if any ambiguity regarding
the stated expectations and preferences is staying in the way, but quite
honestly I do not see it either.

Andrei